Modifying Without a Trace: High-level Audit Guidelines are Inadequate for Electronic Health Record Audit Mechanisms: Difference between revisions

From Ben Works
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:


==== 3.2.1. Ill-defined Standards, Policies, and Regulations ====
==== 3.2.1. Ill-defined Standards, Policies, and Regulations ====
==== 3.2.2. Ineffective Log Analysis ====
== 4. Assessment Methodology ==
=== 4.1 High-level Assessment using Audit Guidelines and Checklists ===
==== 4.1.1 Derivation of Non-specific Auditable Events ====
==== 4.1.2 High-level Assessment Methodology ====
=== 4.2. Low-level Assessment using Black-box Test Cases ===
==== 4.2.1 Audit Test Case Template ====
==== 4.2.2 Audit Test Case Example ====
== 5. Case Studies ==
=== 5.1. Open-source EHR Systems Studied ===
=== 5.2. High-level User-based Non-repudiation Assessment===

Revision as of 22:39, 8 September 2013

J. King, B. Smith, L. Williams, "Modifying Without a Trace: General Audit Guidelines are Inadequate for Electronic Health Record Audit Mechanisms", Proceedings of the International Health Informatics Symposium (IHI 2012), pp. 305-314, 2012.

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Background

3.1. Challenges in Technology

3.1.1. Limited Infrastructure Resources

3.1.2. Log File Reliability

3.2. Challenges in Policy, Regulations, and Compliance

3.2.1. Ill-defined Standards, Policies, and Regulations

3.2.2. Ineffective Log Analysis

4. Assessment Methodology

4.1 High-level Assessment using Audit Guidelines and Checklists

4.1.1 Derivation of Non-specific Auditable Events

4.1.2 High-level Assessment Methodology

4.2. Low-level Assessment using Black-box Test Cases

4.2.1 Audit Test Case Template

4.2.2 Audit Test Case Example

5. Case Studies

5.1. Open-source EHR Systems Studied

5.2. High-level User-based Non-repudiation Assessment