How to do References: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Programsam (talk | contribs) Replaced content with "This book was referenced in" |
Programsam (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This | Step 1 is to copy the reference list generated by EndNote (or whatever I was using for that paper) into the section at the end of the paper. | ||
Format each reference like so: | |||
<pre> | |||
<nowiki> | |||
: <sup>[1]</sup> Smith, Smith and Smith. A very big important paper. pp. 666-667, 2012. | |||
: <sup>[2]</sup> Jones, Jones and Jones. An even MORE important paper, pp. 2-3, 2013. | |||
</nowiki> | |||
</pre> | |||
'''NOTE''' that there are no spaces before the colons. The above gives you: | |||
: <sup>[1]</sup> Smith, Smith and Smith. A very big important paper. pp. 666-667, 2012. | |||
: <sup>[2]</sup> Jones, Jones and Jones. An even MORE important paper, pp. 2-3, 2013. | |||
Step two is to go through each instance of [#] (e.g. [13]) and replace with | |||
<pre> | |||
<nowiki> | |||
This is some razzle-dazzle claim I'm making<sup>[13]</sup>. | |||
</nowiki> | |||
</pre> | |||
Which should give you: | |||
This is some razzle-dazzle claim I'm making<sup>[13]</sup>. | |||
Latest revision as of 23:06, 14 March 2013
Step 1 is to copy the reference list generated by EndNote (or whatever I was using for that paper) into the section at the end of the paper.
Format each reference like so:
: <sup>[1]</sup> Smith, Smith and Smith. A very big important paper. pp. 666-667, 2012. : <sup>[2]</sup> Jones, Jones and Jones. An even MORE important paper, pp. 2-3, 2013.
NOTE that there are no spaces before the colons. The above gives you:
- [1] Smith, Smith and Smith. A very big important paper. pp. 666-667, 2012.
- [2] Jones, Jones and Jones. An even MORE important paper, pp. 2-3, 2013.
Step two is to go through each instance of [#] (e.g. [13]) and replace with
This is some razzle-dazzle claim I'm making<sup>[13]</sup>.
Which should give you:
This is some razzle-dazzle claim I'm making[13].